01 March 2019

Angular Transclusion With Parameters

I recently came across a scenario where I had several components with the same structure in them, so I figured I’d extract it out into it’s own component.
Simple right? Everyday scenario?
Were it so easy…

TL;DR
Problem: Can’t do transclusion and pass properties to content.
Solution: Use ng-template with ng-container *ngTemplateOutlet with a context: { $implicit: variable-name } property.

The problem

Html

<div>
    <h1>Super cool page title</h1>
    <p>You're going to love this demo</p>

    <div *ngFor="let holiday of holidays">
        <div *ngFor="let location of holiday.locations">
            <strong>{{ location.name }}</strong>
            <p>{{ location.picture }}</p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

Typescript

Expand/Collapse ts

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';

export interface Location {
    name: string;
    picture: string;
}

export interface Holiday {
    locations: Location[];
}

@Component({
    selector: 'app-original',
    templateUrl: './original.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./original.component.scss']
})
export class OriginalComponent implements OnInit {
    holidays: Holiday[] = [];

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
        this.holidays = []; // Initialisation removed for brevity
    }
}

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';

export interface Location {
    name: string;
    picture: string;
}

export interface Holiday {
    locations: Location[];
}

@Component({
    selector: 'app-original',
    templateUrl: './original.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./original.component.scss']
})
export class OriginalComponent implements OnInit {
    holidays: Holiday[] = [];

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
        this.holidays = []; // Initialisation removed for brevity
    }
}

I wanted to extract the two *ngFor divs into their own component for reuse in another part of the codebase.
I wanted to be able to do something like:

<div>
    <h1>Super cool page title</h1>
    <p>You're going to love this demo</p>

    <EXTRACTED-COMPONENT [data]="holidays">
        <strong>{{ location.name }}</strong>
        <p>{{ location.picture }}</p>
    </EXTRACTED-COMPONENT>
</div>

I searched around the internet and found several relevant posts and articles (links also at the bottom of the article), but none really explained how it worked or how to make it work properly.

Transclusion

Transclusion was the first stop. This is where an element indicates where it’s child content will be rendered without explicitly knowing what the content is.
Angular provides the ng-content component for this purpose.

transclusion.component.html

<div> 
    <p>This is a title</p>
    <ng-content></ng-content>
</div>

Such a component would be used like this:

<transclusion>
    <p>This is some content</p>
</transclusion>

And you’d get:

This is a title  
This is some content   <--- Pulled through the ng-content

However I’m looking to have the transclusion BUT with some context from structural directives like *ngFor. I figured you’d be able to pass some context to this content, but unfortunately ng-content doesn’t allow dynamic content (docs says it’s performed at compile time), so I needed another solution.

I talked with Tristan Menzel about how to approach this, and he pointed me towards structural directives and templates.

Templates

ng-template provides a way of specifying dynamic transclusion content that can be modified/populated at runtime.

Templates can be rendered inside a ng-container via the *ngTemplateOutput directive.

<div>
    <ng-template let-location>
        <p>{{ location.name }}</p>
    </ng-template>
</div>

<ng-container *ngTemplateOutlet="template; context: { $implicit: location }"></ng-container>

The above code indicates that the ng-container should render the template called template providing it with the implicit knowledge of a variable called location, so the template itself can function. How does this context work?
It’ll be easier to just go through the solution as a whole.

My Solution

I had a hard time putting this succinctly, so let’s start with the finished source.

Extracted component

Html

<div *ngFor="let holiday of holidays">
    <div *ngFor="let location of holiday.locations">
        <ng-container *ngTemplateOutlet="template; context: { $implicit: location }"/>
    </div>
</div>

Typescript

Expand/Collapse ts

import { Component, OnInit, Input, ContentChild, TemplateRef } from '@angular/core';
import { Holiday } from '../original/original.component';

@Component({
    selector: 'app-extracted',
    templateUrl: './extracted.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./extracted.component.scss']
})
export class ExtractedComponent implements OnInit {

    @Input() holidays: Holiday[];

    // Searches the tree for an element of type TemplateRef (ng-template) 
    // and sets this property
    @ContentChild(TemplateRef) template: TemplateRef<any>;

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
    }
}

import { Component, OnInit, Input, ContentChild, TemplateRef } from '@angular/core';
import { Holiday } from '../original/original.component';

@Component({
    selector: 'app-extracted',
    templateUrl: './extracted.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./extracted.component.scss']
})
export class ExtractedComponent implements OnInit {

    @Input() holidays: Holiday[];

    // Searches the tree for an element of type TemplateRef (ng-template) 
    // and sets this property
    @ContentChild(TemplateRef) template: TemplateRef<any>;

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
    }
}

Refactored component

Html

<div>
    <h1>Super cool page title</h1>
    <p>You're going to love this demo</p>

    <app-extracted [holidays]="holidays">
        <ng-template let-location>
            <strong>{{ location.name }}</strong>
            <p>{{ location.picture }}</p>
        </ng-template>
    </app-extracted>
</div>

Typescript

Expand/Collapse ts

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';

export interface Location {
    name: string;
    picture: string;
}

export interface Holiday {
    locations: Location[];
}

@Component({
    selector: 'app-refactored',
    templateUrl: './refactored.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./refactored.component.scss']
})
export class RefactoredComponent implements OnInit {
    holidays: Holiday[] = [];

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
        this.holidays = []; // Initialisation removed for brevity
    }
}

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';

export interface Location {
    name: string;
    picture: string;
}

export interface Holiday {
    locations: Location[];
}

@Component({
    selector: 'app-refactored',
    templateUrl: './refactored.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./refactored.component.scss']
})
export class RefactoredComponent implements OnInit {
    holidays: Holiday[] = [];

    constructor() { }

    ngOnInit() {
        this.holidays = []; // Initialisation removed for brevity
    }
}

EDIT: Note that for reduced black box magic, you can specify the template directly instead of with @ContentChild.
See below. @ContentChild replaced in the Typescript with @Input() and the html altered slightly to give the template an id with #template and the app-extracted component takes the template as a variable directly.

<app-extracted [holidays]="holidays" [template]="template">
    <ng-template let-location #template>
        <strong>{{ location.name }}</strong>
        <p>{{ location.picture }}</p>
    </ng-template>
</app-extracted>

Steps I took

Pull those *ngFor divs out into a new component
Provide the new component with the data previously given to the outer *ngFor
Wrap the content of the inner *ngFor in a ng-template instead

We need to provide the location variable to this as it’s undefined right now

Provide context via the let-location directive

let-variablename creates an implicit variable called variablename for the code block. This means that the variable is expected to be defined in the context provided to the template.

The extracted component requires a template outlet container, somewhere to render the ng-template we just defined.

We also need to setup that implicit variable for the ng-template context.

Some detail

*ng-container renders the ng-template from the parent component.
In this example, the ng-template is discovered by the ng-container via the @ContentChild(TemplateRef) decorator.
- Searches the tree for the first occurrance of the indicated type (TemplateRef, which here is a ng-template)
The template gets the inner variable via the context: { $implicit: location} part of the ng-container *ngTemplateOutput statement.
- Coupled with the ng-template let-location statement, this creates an implicit context containing the variable location as if it was declared.
- There’s no intellisense provided for the let-location or any use of the location variable afterwards.

Take home points

let-variable indicates to ng-template an implicit variable it can expect
Context can be provided to ng-container by expanding on the *ngTemplateOutlet property
@ContentChild can be used to find the template for you or you can provide it as a standard angular input variable (but looks messier)
The combination of all this allows transclusion with passed variables

Building blocks:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42978082/what-is-let-in-angular-2-templates
https://blog.angular-university.io/angular-ng-content/
https://medium.com/claritydesignsystem/ng-content-the-hidden-docs-96a29d70d11b
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51807192/passing-for-variable-to-ng-content

Tags: angular

Angular Transclusion With Parameters

The problem

Transclusion

transclusion.component.html

Templates

My Solution

Extracted component

Refactored component

Steps I took

Some detail

Take home points

Building blocks:

Kael’s Kabbage

Tech Superfood

Recent Posts

Recent Render